Scribd
Upload
5 views

Quasi Experiments

Uploaded by

Ahmed Saban Ahmed Wara
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views

Quasi Experiments

Uploaded by

Ahmed Saban Ahmed Wara
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

Quasi Experiments

Non-Experimental Research
Research Methods & Statistics
Fall 2011
Quasi Experiments
• “Research procedure in which the scientist must select
subjects for different conditions from preexisting groups”
– Research Methods, McBurney & White
• “An empirical study used to estimate the causal impact of
an intervention on its target population. Quasi-
experimental research designs share many similarities with
the traditional experimental design or randomized
controlled trial, but they specifically lack the element of
random assignment to treatment or control. Instead, quasi-
experimental designs typically allow the researcher to
control the assignment to the treatment condition, but
using some criterion other than random assignment.
– Wikipedia, Nov. 17, 2011
It’s a matter of control
True Experiment Quasi Experiment
• Random assignment of • Selection of subjects for the
subjects to condition conditions
• Manipulate the IV • Observe categories of
subjects
– If the subject variable is the
IV, it’s a quasi experiment
• Don’t know whether
• Control allows ruling out of differences are caused by
alternative hypotheses the IV or differences in the
subjects
Other features
• In some instances cannot completely control
the what, when, where, and how
– Need to collect data at a certain time or not at all
– Practical limitations to data collection,
experimental protocol
Validity
• Internal validity is reduced due to the
presence of controlled/confounded variables
– But not necessarily invalid
• It’s important for the researcher to evaluate
the likelihood that there are alternative
hypotheses for observed differences
– Need to convince self and audience of the validity
External validity
• If the experimental setting more closely
replicates the setting of interest, external
validity can be higher than a true experiment
run in a controlled lab setting
• Often comes down to what is most important
for the research question
Nonequivalent Control Group Designs
• 2 groups, non-random allocation of subjects
and groups, pre-test, treatment (Y/N), post-
test
• Desired pattern:
– Dependent variables have equal pre-test values,
difference seen between experimental and control
groups on post-test (Pre: LL, Post: HL)
– Want to show that any differences that exist did
not impact the value of the variable of interest
Mixed Factorial Design with One Non-
manipulated Variable
• Example: experiment on pain perception (effect of
caffeine, expected differences between men and
women)
• Protocol:
– 25 men/25 women, each takes part in two sessions, one
week apart
– One session: drink coffee (decaf) and put hand in ice-water
until feel pain
– Other session: drink coffee (caffeinated) and put hand in
ice-water until feel pain
• Between subjects variable (male/female)
• Within subjects variable (caffeine intake)
Non-Experimental Research
• “Any quantitative study without manipulation
of treatments or random assignment is a non-
experimental study”
• Experimental research shows cause and effect
• Non-experimental research studies variables
as they exist
Purpose
• Descriptive:
– primary focus for the research is to describe some
phenomenon or to document its characteristics.
• Predictive:
– primary focus for the research is to predict some
variable of interest (criterion) using information from
other variables (predictors).
• Explanatory :
– the primary focus for the research is to explain how
some phenomenon works or why it operates.
Time Frame
• Cross-sectional:
– data are collected at one point in time, often in order to
make comparisons across different types of respondents
or participants.
• Prospective (longitudinal):
– data are collected on multiple occasions starting with the
present and going into the future for comparisons across
time.
• Retrospective:
– look back in time using existing or available data to explain
or explore an existing occurrence.

You might also like